Novel laser therapies and new technologies in the endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease. The gold standard treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Endoscopic management of UTUC has emerged as an alternative therapy that aims to preserve kidney function while providing effective oncologic control. Over the years, this has become an increasingly important alternative to RNU for treating UTUC in patients with localized disease. Advancements in lasers and endoscopic technology have continued to expand the applications of endoscopic nephron-sparing treatment. This review aims to provide an overview of the available lasers and ureteroscopic technologies used in treating UTUC with a focus on their clinical applications and outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was completed using PubMed to create this narrative mini review. Publications from peer-reviewed journals written in English between 1987 to 2022 were evaluated by the authors for inclusion. Key Content and Findings: Improvements in ureteroscopic technology have led to improved visualization and tumor detection. Laser ablation using different laser energies including the holmium/yttrium-aluminum-garnet, neodymium/YAG, and thulium/YAG has demonstrated promising oncologic outcomes. However, accurate staging and risk-stratification remain limitations to the role of laser ablation for the treatment of UTUC. This review also highlights appropriate patient selection as a critical component of successful endoscopic management. Conclusions: The continued evolution of endoscopic management will rely on the development of new technologies to improve risk stratification and oncologic outcomes. Overall, this review provides insights into the available laser therapies and ureteroscopic technologies for the endoscopic management of UTUC.

Contemporary Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Genitourinary Cancers: Where Are We in 2023?

CONTEXT: Lymphadenectomy during surgery for genitourinary malignancies has varying benefits. OBJECTIVE: To review contemporary evidence on lymph node dissection in genitourinary cancers. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a collaborative review to summarize current evidence supporting lymph node dissection in urothelial, prostate, kidney, penile, and testis cancers. We present the evidence on patient selection and recommended dissection templates, and highlight knowledge gaps and ongoing areas of investigation. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Lymph node dissection remains the reference standard for lymph node staging. Pathologic nodal stage informs prognosis and guides adjuvant treatment. Appropriate template and patient selection are paramount to optimize outcomes and capitalize on the selective therapeutic benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate staging with lymphadenectomy is contingent on appropriate template selection. The cumulative benefit will depend on judicious patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY: We performed a collaborative review by a diverse group of experts in urology. We reviewed current evidence on lymph node dissection.

Complex Urethral Diverticulectomy: Is a Synchronous Prophylactic Autologous Fascial Sling Needed?

IMPORTANCE: Urethral diverticulectomy is performed with or without concomitant pubovaginal sling (PVS). Patients with complex UD are more frequently offered concomitant PVS. However, there is paucity of literature comparing postoperative incontinence rates for patients with simple versus complex UD. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) rates after Urethral Diverticulectomy without concomitant PVS for both complex and simple cases. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 55 patients who underwent Urethral Diverticulectomy from 2007 to 2021. Preoperative SUI was patient-reported and confirmed with cough stress test result. Complex cases were defined as circumferential or horseshoe configurations, prior diverticulectomy, and/or anti-incontinence procedure. Primary outcome was postoperative SUI. Secondary outcome was interval PVS. Complex and simple cases were compared using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Median age was 49 years (interquartile range, 36-58 years). Median follow-up was 5.4 months (IQR, 2-24 months). Thirty of 55 (55%) cases were simple, and 25 of 55 (45%) complex. Preoperative SUI was present in 19/57 (35%) (11 complex vs 8 simple, P = 0.25). Stress urinary incontinence persisted postoperatively in 10 of 19 (52%) (6 complex vs 4 simple, P = 0.48). De novo SUI occurred in 7 of 55, 12% (4 complex vs 3 simple, P = 0.68). Overall, 17 of 55 (31%) patients had postoperative SUI (10 complex vs 7 simple, P = 0.24). Of those, 8 of 17 underwent subsequent PVS placement (P = 0.71) and 9 of 17 had resolution of pad use after physical therapy (P = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence of an association between complexity and postoperative SUI. Age at surgery and preoperative frequency were the strongest predictors of postoperative SUI in this cohort. Our findings suggest successful complex urethral diverticulum repair does not require concomitant PVS.

Urinary Outcomes After Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Whole-Gland Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Suprapubic Tube to Indwelling Urethral Catheter.

Background: MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) is under investigation for whole-gland ablation of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. The ideal method for post-TULSA bladder drainage through postoperative suprapubic tube (SPT) vs indwelling urethral catheter (UC) has not been established. The objective of this study was to evaluate urinary outcomes after whole-gland TULSA, comparing postoperative SPT with UC. Materials and Methods: Two-institution retrospective analysis of whole-gland TULSA for men with grade group 1 and 2 prostate cancer. One institution placed SPT at the time of TULSA with clamp trials (day 10) and removal once voiding. The second placed UC until void trial (day 7). Outcomes included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), urinary bother score, catheter reinsertion, stricture, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), and incontinence. Results: Forty-five patients (median age 67) were analyzed. The UC cohort (N = 26) was older (p = 0.007) than the SPT cohort (N = 19) but with similar baseline prostate volumes, IPSS, and urinary bother scores. Patients receiving UC had fewer days with catheter (p = 0.013). Although UC patients suffered more lower urinary tract symptoms at 1-month post-TULSA, there was no significant difference between IPSS scores at baseline and 6 months after surgery regardless of urinary management strategy, although the UC group noted significantly decreased urinary bother. Rates of infection were similar between groups. Six strictures were observed overall, with more in the SPT group, although the difference was not significant (4/19 [21.1%] SPT; 2/26 [7.7%] UC). At 6 months, incontinence rates were low and similar between groups (2/19 [10.5%] SPT; 4/26 [15.4%] UC) and only one patient (UC) required CIC. Conclusions: Our overall findings suggest that SPT and UC are both acceptable options for postoperative bladder drainage after whole-gland TULSA, with statistically similar rates of urinary complications but a slightly different side effect profile.

Analysis of fixed and variable operating room (or) time point efficiency in partial nephrectomies: open versus robotic-assisted.

To analyze operating room (OR) efficiency by evaluating fixed and variable OR times for open (OPN) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN). We analyzed consecutive OPN and RAPN performed by one surgeon over a 24-month period. All patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position and secured with a beanbag regardless of approach. Fixed (non-procedural) OR times were prospectively collected and defined as: in-room to anesthesia-release time (IRAT), anesthesia release to cut time (ARCT), and close to wheels-out time (CTWO). Variable OR time was procedural cut to close time (CTCT). Comparisons of fixed and variable OR time points between OPN and RAPN were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. 146 RAPN and 31 OPN were evaluated from 2019-2020. Median IRAT was similar for RAPN versus OPN [20 min (IQR: 16-25) vs. 20 min (IQR: 16-26), P = 0.57]. Median ARCT was longer for RAPN than it was for OPN [40 min (IQR: 36-46) vs. 34 min (IQR: 30-39), P < 0.001]. Median CTWO was similar for OPN (12 min, IQR: 9-14) and RAPN (11 min, IQR: 7-15) (P = 0.89). Median CTCT was longer for RAPN (202 min, IQR: 170-236) compared to OPN (164 min, IQR: 154-184) (P < 0.001). In a single surgeon, partial nephrectomy series with the same patient positioning, utilization of robotic technology was associated with longer surgeon operating time as well as less efficient fixed OR times, specifically ARCT.

Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate Fixed Operating Room Times.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors influencing fixed operating room time during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed for all holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) cases performed by a single surgeon over a 24-month period. Operating room (OR) time was divided into fixed and variable time. The variable time was defined as cut-to-close time. Fixed time included in room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release time to cut time (ARCT), and close time to wheels out (CTWO). The effects of time of day and anesthesia personnel (AP) changes on fixed operating room time were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 406 HoLEPs were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in nonprocedural OR times between morning and afternoon surgeries (IRAT, P = .38, ARCT P = .10, CTWO P = .77). Median nonprocedural OR times accounted for 27% (IQR: 22%-31%) of the total procedure time in the AM group and 29% (IQR: 24%-33%) in the PM group (P = .005). Of the HoLEPs,78.1% (178/228) experienced one or more AP changes during the procedure. The median fixed OR time was not significantly different between procedures with 1 AP and procedures with ≥2 APs (IRAT, P = .53; ARCT, P = .71; CTWO, P = .98). CONCLUSION: Fixed operating room time makes up a significant portion of HoLEP procedures and should be considered when evaluating OR efficiency. The time of day and number of anesthesia personnel involved did not affect the fixed OR times.

Novel plasma glycoprotein biomarkers predict progression-free survival in surgically resected clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Limited data exists on utilization of protein post-translational modifications as biomarkers for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We employed high-throughput glycoproteomics to evaluate differential expression of glycoprotein-isoforms as novel markers for ccRCC progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from 77 patients treated surgically for ccRCC. Glycoproteomic analyses were carried out after liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Age-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate PFS. Optimized Harrell's C-index was employed to dichotomize the collective for the construction of Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: The average length of follow-up was 3.4 (range: 0.04-9.83) years. Glycoproteomic analysis identified 39 glycopeptides and 14 non-glycosylated peptides that showed statistically significant (false discovery rate P ≤ 0.05) differential expression associated with PFS. Five of the glycosylated peptides conferred continuous hazard ratio (HR) of > 6 (range 6.3-11.6). These included prothrombin A2G2S glycan motif (HR = 6.47, P = 9.53E-05), immunoglobulin J chain FA2G2S2 motif (HR = 10.69, P = 0.001), clusterin A2G2 motif (HR = 7.38, P = 0.002), complement component C8A A2G2S2 motif (HR = 11.59, P = 0.002), and apolipoprotein M glycopeptide with non-fucosylated and non-sialylated hybrid-type glycan (HR = 6.30, P = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier curves based on dichotomous expression of these five glycopeptides resulted in hazard ratios of 3.9 to 10.7, all with P-value < 0.03. Kaplan-Meyer plot using the multivariable model comprising 3 of the markers yielded HR of 11.96 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Differential glyco-isoform abundance of plasma proteins may be a useful source of biomarkers for the clinical course and prognosis of ccRCC.

Evaluation of Routine Postoperative Labs Following Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients With Normal Preoperative Renal Function.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of abnormal routine postoperative day 1 (POD1) labs in patients with normal pre-operative renal function following robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and the associated clinical outcomes of these lab results. METHODS: We analyzed 500 consecutive RAPN from a single surgeon series. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) III or greater were excluded from the study. Three hundred ninty-three RAPN were included in the analysis. Routine POD1 lab tests including hemoglobin (Hgb), creatinine, potassium, and sodium were evaluated to determine rates of abnormal values and rates of clinical intervention. Abnormal Hgb at POD1 was defined as <8 g/dL or ≥3 g/dL decrease from the preoperative (baseline) value. Abnormal sodium (Na) preoperatively and postoperatively was defined as <135 mEq/L or >145 mEq/L. Abnormal potassium (K) was defined preoperatively and POD1 as <3.5 mEq/L or >5 mEq/L. RESULTS: Of 37.4% (147/393) had one or more abnormal labs at POD1. Of the 101 patients with abnormal Hgb, 15 patients required blood transfusion. Twenty-six patients had abnormal sodium for which two were treated with IV fluids. Twenty-seven patients had potassium abnormalities (12/25 were hypokalemia). Acute kidney injury stage I was seen in 27 patients (6.9%) and stage II in 3 (0.8%). Patients with abnormal labs were more likely to have larger renal mass, higher R.E.N.A.L. scores, intraoperative complications, longer operative times, and higher EBL on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: POD1 serum laboratory tests appear to be necessary following RAPN in patients with normal pre-operative renal function.

Evaluation of Peri-operative Outcomes Associated With Resident Involvement on Tumor Resection and Renorrhaphy During Robotic-assisted Partial Nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative outcomes of resident trainee involvement in tumor resection and renorrhaphy during robotic assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 500 consecutive RAPN in a single surgeon prospectively maintained database. Cases with resident performed tumor resection and renorrhaphy (N = 71) were case matched on R.E.N.A.L. score and RAPN year using a greedy matching algorithm. Perioperative variables were compared to attending cases. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in high grade postoperative complications (resident: 3% vs attending: 6%, P = .68), positive margins (resident: 1% vs attending: 3%, P = .31), length of stay (resident: 2.0 vs attending: 2.0 days, P = .73), and 30 day readmission (resident: 7% vs attending: 11%, P = .56). However, residents had a statistically significant longer warm ischemia time (median 21 vs 15 minutes, P <.001), thus less likely to achieve trifecta (66% vs 85%, P = .02). Resident involvement had longer median operative time (197 vs 184 minutes, P = .03). No statistically significant difference in functional volume loss (P = .12) or surface intermediate base margin score (P = .66) between residents and attending was found. No difference in post-operative creatinine change was found at 1 day and 1 month (resident: 0.2 vs attending: 0.1 mg/dL, P = .4 and resident: 0.1 vs attending: 0.1 mg/dL, P = .6, respectively). CONCLUSION: Supervised resident console involvement in tumor resection and renorrhaphy during RAPN is safe and does not increase rates of complications. Residents have longer median warm ischemia time compared to attending only cases, but this does not appear to impact post-operative renal function.

Independent external validation of a nomogram to define risk categories for a significant decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Martini nomogram predicting the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: Estimated glomerular filtration rate of 406 patients from a single surgeon series was calculated before robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy and at postoperative intervals. To determine the risk group, we calculated the total score and corresponding risk of significant estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction at 15 months using the Martini nomogram. The primary outcome was a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥25% from preoperative levels between 1 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The median length of follow up for this study was 12 months (interquartile range 6-12 months). Overall, 134 (33%) patients were in the low-, 143 (35%) in the intermediate-, 119 (29%) in the high- and 10 (2%) in the very high-risk groups. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for the probability of significant estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction by 12 months after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy was 12.9% in the low-risk group, 24.0% in the intermediate-risk group, 49.7% in the high-risk group and 40.0% in the very high-risk group. Harrell's C-index for discriminating between those with and without a significant reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate 1-12 months after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.68-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The risk groups proposed by the Martini nomogram are accurate in predicting those at higher risk for a >25% decline in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy at 12 months.